When I taught argumentative writing, my students had to write an essay
on which the topic was "an issue of social concern about which reasonable
people may differ, and about which you feel passionately." Inevitably,
someone would choose assisted suicide. However, on the next essay, they were
required to do the research and write an argument in opposition to their prior
essay. Generally, those who wrote in favor of assisted suicide were at a loss.
However, I would steer them into a reminder of decision-making until
they realized the slippery slope of this issue: if it is acceptable to allow
someone suicide, the value of life itself is diminished AND another is given
the ability to make the choice. Where then, does that choice end? Is it parents
deciding for children; children deciding for parents; spouses making a choice;
or the state or courts making the choice. Eventually, in issues of conflict,
the courts decide. That means that the state has made the choice.
It all boils down to value: what are the consequences and is it worth
it? If the state is making these choices, eventually, the fiscal cost of
maintaining life will overcome the intrinsic value of life itself. Then, the
value starts being rated against contribution to society. Wow! When the
Affordable-Care-Act was being touted, I received a letter from Medicare
explaining that the costs of my monthly medication was too high and I could
anticipate them being terminated. I was not yet 50 years old, and was told I
cost too much. My 20 years of service to the Marines has protected me, but it
is a mental blow to be told your life is not worth as much as the medication to
keep you alive.
So, do we choose to actively kill those who cost too much and who do not
contribute in someone's eyes? And what gives that someone the right to make
that decision. If the state is making a cost-benefit-analysis for us, then we
need to do some research into Germany, China, and other social-communist
history states wherein the state decides that the old, the infirm, or the
somehow less than perfect must be destroyed. Where then is the cutoff
point? Is it at age 50? It is when
someone is on life-long meds for hypertension or diabetes?
I don’t know the answers. I know
that my God put me here for a purpose, and as yet, I must not have finished
serving it or I would not be here as the opportunity for my death has been
stymied too many times. I know this
article scratches the surface of a horrible truth – that we are selfish beings,
and in being so, our intrinsic value is also reduced. Truly, in our humanity we have little enough
value. But, in our ability to do good,
to help others, and to worship God, we have no reason nor authority to do ill
to anyone who is not first doing it to us!
No comments:
Post a Comment